Put your forest in and run the numbers
The more you fill in, the closer the result is to your situation; the fields marked required are enough to get an answer. Everything is computed in your browser — nothing is uploaded.
Annual cash flow
Cash and accrual are listed separately. The timber component is an accrual, not money received this year.
| Understory economy | +500 |
| Canopy economy | +80 |
| Spatial use | +150 |
| Ecosystem services | +50 |
| Cash inflow, subtotal | +780 |
| Timber biomass growth (accrual, not cash) | +180 |
| Tending | −220 |
| Insurance | −30 |
| Taxes and fees | −40 |
| Administration | −80 |
| Cash outflow, subtotal | −370 |
| Net operating cash flow | +410 |
Allocation waterfall
Paid down a contractual and statutory order of priority; only what remains after the first five tiers goes to investors.
- Land rentLand owner 120
- Debt serviceLenders 100
- Tending and reinvestmentBack into this forest 70
- Disaster and tending reserveRing-fenced reserve 40
- Operator fee and performanceManagement team 30
- Distributable investor cash flow 50
⚠️ Net cash flow cannot cover the first five tiers. Shortfall: 0
Forest balance sheet
Net equity = assets − liabilities. Note: a change in equity is not investor return.
- Standing timber (volume × market price)24,000,000
- Future timber growth (discounted future income)15,934,829
- Multi-direction operating rights (discounted net cash flow)36,296,000
- Cash and reserves400,000
- Total assets76,630,829
- Bank loan balance10,000,000
- Land rent payable (remaining term)24,000,000
- Restoration and fire-duty provision600,000
- Total liabilities34,600,000
The four metrics (not interchangeable)
- Biological growth rate 7.50%
A physical metric: annual growth ÷ standing volume. It enters no monetary calculation.
- Timber market value growth 0.00%
A market metric: driven by your price assumption, not by how fast the trees grow.
- Project operating IRR 17.54%
An investment metric: fed only by operating cash flow and net felling revenue. ⚠️ The higher today’s timber price, the lower this number — because entry costs more.
Sensitivity: how much the answer moves
Each key assumption pushed once, to see how net forest equity responds. Relative change is more meaningful than absolute — every project has its own absolute figures.
| Base case | 42,030,829 | — |
| Timber price −20% | 34,043,864 | −19.0% |
| Timber price +20% | 50,017,795 | +19.0% |
| Operating costs +15% | 37,117,590 | −11.7% |
| Discount rate +2 points | 36,432,278 | −13.3% |
Exit test: what price must timber reach?
This is the question "why would the next holder pay that?" The basis matches the IRR: harvest and sell logs, with terminal net proceeds = volume × (price − harvest cost).
Operating cash flow alone already exceeds the target return — **the target is met even if timber prices stay flat or fall**, with no reliance on a higher price from the next holder.
- The result follows from your inputs, it is not our forecast: you set the parameters; the numbers only carry them through.
- Timber growth value before felling is an accrual; we do not count it as cash flow or as an annual return.
- This page uses only the parameters you enter. Brand, processing capacity, subsidies and similar cannot be derived from them, so they are excluded.
- All computation happens locally in your browser; nothing is uploaded or stored, and a refresh clears it.